What drives behaviour? Why is personal change so hard? When you are in a leadership position and you spend some time considering why it's so hard to change and mold other people's behaviour -- consider for a second how hard it is to change your own.  The more I think about this type of thing the more clear it becomes that it is not "set better goals" or "work harder," the keys are in the inputs which drive better outputs. The keys are in the preparation and the last step before your present one. 

A virtuous circle is defined as, "a chain of events in which one desirable occurrence leads to another which further promotes the first occurrence and so on resulting in a continuous process of improvement." If this isn't what we should be striving for I don't know what is. It includes elements of compounding, think Jim Collins' Flywheel philosophy, multiplier effects, and snowballs into bigger and better outcomes. Contrast this with a vicious circle, described as, "a chain of events in which the response to one difficulty creates a new problem that aggravates the original difficulty." Stark contrast, both with the ability to take you up or down with equal speed - maybe.....I would argue a vicious circle can be faster as success is gained through time, perseverance and grinding. There is no reality-based notion of an overnight success, and as the Stoic philosopher Epictetus puts it, “No great thing is created suddenly.”

Examples are needed to hash some of this out and all is context dependent but readers could apply the framework to their scenario and follow examples through both virtuous and vicious circles. On a personal level going through one's day we could easily get to both sides of this coin.
       Poor sleep, leads to tired and moody, leads to putting off a workout, leads to feeling bad about yourself for putting off the workout, leads to eating with little discipline and a touch of self-sabotage, leads to poor communication with your partner, leads to self-loathing - leads to worse sleep and so on and so forth. My argument of circles and feedback loops is that if you had of taken the first input, sleep, and got that down it would have given you a much better chance of improving every next step and ultimately your whole day (which obviously can multiply into your whole life).
        Taking the positive side - You get your 8hrs sleep, you wake up feeling better, workout before you eat, go straight to the shower, you are way more inclined to commit to that cold shower, you feel 2 or 3 levels of accomplishment and it's still morning. If you slept, and worked out, you are far more likely to commit to eating something healthy, your mood, energy, and focus are all better, your communication is better, your creativity and professional output is much better, you have no self-sabotage going on and are motivated to keep it going the next day. This is not from better goals, this as James Clear, author of Atomic Habits would say is from optimizing the system. Set yourself up to succeed so that you can succeed, the key there is you are setting the table, the preparation and commitment to each step is there.  The tricky part is in the planning phase, you have to have a will and a desire to PLAN to move yourself (or your employees, team, family, etc) forward. Discipline = Freedom, as former Navy Seal and always badass Jocko Willink famously says.

The good news in thinking in terms of the virtuous circle is that the force of will can take you back onto the path even if other elements weren't ideal. If you got 5 hours of sleep, you can force yourself to workout and eat healthy and help improve the rest of your day. However, is that sustainable? Again, the key is to play the long-game. Success, self-improvement, professional growth, takes time. The people that stay consistent, WIN. Period.

I will close with again stating the definition of a virtuous circle. When I read this I find it exciting, motivating, and a great underlying foundation in getting yourself on the path!
A virtuous circle is, 

                                                                                              ----sounds pretty good to me!!

I was fortunate to be able to present at the Cross Canada Coaches Clinic last evening from here on the East Coast in Canada.

Below are my slides and the download to the original PowerPoint file for anyone who may be interested.

With The Last Dance weekly on every single basketball fan's (and beyond) screen the notion of competitiveness is one I would like to explore. It takes no time at all listening to Michael Jordan speak (or watching his famous Hall of Fame speech) to see what makes him tick.

But is it about competition or is it about winning? Is there a difference? I think there is...

One thing I discovered interestingly this year is that the base of the word compete means "to strive together," the original Latin definition didn't refer to rivalry or outdoing an opponent at all, it was not until later uses that it morphed into that.
To go with this newfound meaning of the word compete goes Peter Thiel's best selling book Zero to One. Thiel founded PayPal and was the first outside investor in Facebook, among many other impressive resume pieces. Thiel spends most of the book arguing against, as he puts it, the "ideology of competition." Rather, he believes in going from "Zero to 1," building something new, and gaining monopoly share. He uses multiple examples of how competition for scarce resources really does not lead the competitors to get further ahead, and how it leads to zero-sum games.

Where these notions come together for me is when placing them under the lens of what you can and cannot control. You do not have complete control over your opponents, their programs, companies, etc. The road to success and championships (in my context) is not by climbing a ladder or going through a maze of competitors, in Peter Thiel's world it would mean you move out of that box and build an elevator, or find your way outside the maze but still ultimately get to the end. In a basketball sense this means spending less time worrying about beating and scouting your opponent and more time building your team and program. John Wooden famously didn't focus on his opponents nearly as much as his own team, or as 49'ers legend Bill Walsh puts it, you want to "Let the Score Take Care of Itself." We spent a whole lot of time this year talking about what is inside your circle of control, circle of influence and what is not. Our team bought into working towards directing all of our energy only towards the elements which were directly in our control, inputs not outputs. As always it's an ongoing process.

This is a set of ideas I look forward to continuing to explore but I think my early conclusion is that competing and winning are not synonymous. You can absolutely win and not spend your time focusing on beating the "competition." This is not black and white obviously but in terms of the Pareto 80/20 principle we would be spending the bulk of our time and energy on what we can control, grow, and actively see improve, which is ourselves.

Lately I've been considering the difference between people or teams who have won vs. people or teams who are considered winners. I believe there is a pronounced difference and distinction.

Being SOMEONE WHO HAS WON is short term, being a WINNER is your identity. These two things aren’t necessarily tied together, you can be someone who has won and not be a winner. A WINNER never stops striving, growing, and bettering themselves and the team (because it is who they are). You may show that you can win, now you need to take the next step.

To become a winner I think it has to be more a character trait than a short term sprint for a championship. In team sports the more of these types of athletes you can have and develop on the team the score and end results will take care of themselves.

New York Times best selling author James Clear addresses this in his book Atomic Habits --

“The ultimate form of intrinsic motivation is when a habit becomes part of your identity. It’s one thing to say I’m the type of person who wants this. It’s something very different to say I’m the type of person who is this.”

Throughout Atomic Habits, Clear also discusses getting away from goal setting saying "winners and losers both have the same goals." In an achievement sense this is true. The difference is the type of person you are, how you see yourself, and the actions you take.

If you consider yourself a WINNER and have proof to back that up (HAVING WON) then you take actions to reinforce that identity. As I saw Buzz Williams say recently "The work is the reward."
It's in your bones and just unapologetically who you are, a WINNER.

Related content -- The book "So Good They Can't Ignore You" by Cal Newport argues the point of not "following your passion," blindly and rather finding meaning in your work by being great -- Cal's Blog 

Bruce Pearl on Coach's and Player's roles in winning championships -- click on image below

video credit to ESPN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfvLcLpDT7E

The video below shows a quick clip from the Canada vs. Spain U17 World Cup game earlier today in Belarus. With the FIBA rule of a 14 second reset teams MUST have concepts and strategies in place to capitalize on scoring opportunities. There is little time to center the ball for a set offense.

With offensive strategy such as this of trying to space the floor well and re-attack quickly, attention must be paid to the defensive end of the floor as well. On defense, especially on the weak side, defenders need to be on high-alert, knowing that their opponents will be seeking situations to take advantage of.  Teams should certainly look at tracking offense after the OREB to see how to improve efficiency.

In this clip the Canadian [weak side] defender relaxes and loses her attention to the ball, giving up an easy layup at the rim. Note how Spain keeps good spacing allowing for the quick attack.

Offensive Rebound Strategy Ideas

1. Space the floor
   
2. Attack a potentially disorganized defense
   
3. Bring up the forward for a pick and roll
   
4. Lift the forward to high post and quick action off the entry
   

Great example here of a step up screen by the Cleveland Cavaliers. By running a side, spaced-out, step up ball screen you put the help in a very precarious position. In the video and the typical rotation is for x3 to rotate over leaving many possible openings. Crowder reads the situation and runs to the rim for an easy lay-in.